Donacien-Jerry NDZINGA BOUNDJANG

Hello!
I hope you are well. I wonder if there is a threshold (%) margin of error for that allometric equation is applicable to a forest type?
Thank you and good day to all.

Bonsoir a toute l'équipe de la Lopé,
J'espère que la formation se passe bien et que tout le monde va bien. Je suppose que nous auront bientôt de grands experts en recherches des écosystèmes tropicaux.
Bon courage, portez vous bien et salutation à tout le monde
Jerry

Hello M.Yadvinder,
I am very honored for the attention you paid to my concern. I actually recalculated me as you have indicated, but there are significant differences between the results of three equations.
ex: Diameter (103.9Cm) Height (47.6m) it gives: Eq1 (17984.820), Eq2 (14166.752) and Eq 3 (17470.753)

  This is why I would like to know if there is a margin of error for each of these equations and what percentages.
At what point can we consider an equation is applicable in a forest type?
Thank you again for your clarification that you bring me, good day
Donacien-Jerry

Hello and I hope you're well. am currently in the process of comparing the results of estimates of carbon stocks using allometric equation 3, except that I see equation incorporating
the diameter, height and density of the tree gives very different results (many Educated more) than the other equations. Is this normal? Thank you for your contribution and good day.
Equation 1= 0,05*H*D2*d

Equation 2=exp(-2.289 + (2.649* ln(D)) – (0.021*ln(D²)))

Equation 3= (d*exp(-1.499+(2.148*ln(D)) + (0.207*ln(D)2 - (0.0281*ln(D)3))*0.001